One evening
during Billy Graham's 1954 London crusade the much-loved Gospel singer,
George Beverly Shea, chose to sing John Peterson's Gospel song: "It took a
miracle to put the stars in place; It took a miracle to hang the world in
space."
Listening to the song, an irate English woman stormed out
of the meeting and penned an angry letter to Billy Graham in which she
complained, "You have the audacity to come to England at all and tell us
how to live, let alone the impertinence to put your soloist up there to
sing, 'It took America to put the stars in place. It took America to hang
the world in space!' "
Communication. It is vital that Christians communicate
well. We have great news to share with the world and it is essential that
we communicate that news clearly, understandably and boldly.
As we think of sharing the good news that we have with our
friends, our neighbours, with our community and world we know that we must
be people who study the Word. But this morning I want to suggest that we
must also study the world. If our communication of God's love is to be
clear and understandable we must begin to understand what questions our
culture is asking, what forces are motivating them, and what goals they
are trying to achieve.
And I would suggest that this is not an unbiblical
approach. Paul was a master of the Word of God. He knew his Scriptures.
But Paul also knew the world to which he sought to bring the Word. He knew
both and we'll see how well he knew the Word and the World in a moment.
But the point is we must understand the word and the world
in which we live. Now one of the characteristics of the society in which
we live that I want to focus on this morning is pluralism. I want to
address the question how do we share the love of Christ, the claims of
Christ in a pluralistic society. In simple terms, plural means more than
one. When applied to beliefs or systems of thought to be pluralistic is
to acknowledge more than one ultimate principle.
Very quickly - what are the characteristics of a
pluralistic society? First, choice is the rule of the day. In a
pluralistic society various points of view are encouraged and considered
valid. So choice is the rule of the day.
When you go to Swiss Chalet you are faced with a myriad of
choices. Half or quarter chicken? Fries or baked potato? Caesar or
garden salad? House, Thousand Island, French, Ranch, Creamy Italian
dressing? So many choices so that by the time the waitress asks you what
you want to drink you just say, "Something wet please".
But the complexity of life is not limited to a simple meal
out. Moral decisions, ethical dilemmas, lifestyle options, faith
commitments, they are all areas where there is now a whole host of
options. There is in our culture no single standard for judging right
from wrong. There is no single set of rules for judging what is
appropriate. Choice is the rule of the day.
Also, in our pluralistic culture there is no such thing as
absolute truth. It is believed that there is no truth out there that is
right for every one. Only the individual responding to a particular
situation can decide what is right or wrong for themselves. Moral
absolutes are questioned in our society. So too are religious absolutes.
Any claim that Christianity is absolute, unique, definitive, final,
normative, and ultimate or universal is renounced.
Many in our pluralistic age would agree with Gandhi's
assessment of the claims of Christ: "The soul of religions is one, but is
encased in a multitude of forms ... Truth is the exclusive property of no
single scripture ... I cannot ascribe exclusive divinity to Jesus. He is
as divine as Krishna or Rama or Mohammad."
Also in our pluralistic culture, tolerance is a virtue.
"Do unto others as you would have them do unto you" gets changed to "Let
others do what they want to do so that you can do what you want to do."
So a pluralistic society is characterized by choice, the
absence of absolute truth and tolerance. It follows then that anyone who
stands up for what they believe or tries to persuade others to a accept a
different lifestyle and point of view is often characterized as negative,
narrow, inhibited and a fanatic.
So how do we share the good news of Jesus Christ with such
a culture? How can we engage such a culture in a discussion in a way that
earns a hearing and possibly with the dependence on the Holy Spirit brings
about a change.
Well, this fact of pluralism is not new it was present in
the culture in which Paul lived. It was present in particular in Athens.
And if we open our Bibles to Acts 17:16-34. We discover how Paul sought
to relate the good news of the existence of God to culture that was
pluralistic in its attitude.
While
Paul was waiting for them in Athens, he was deeply distressed to see that
the city was full of idols. So he argued in the synagogue with the Jews
and the devout persons, and also in the marketplace£ every day with those
who happened to be there. Also some Epicurean and Stoic philosophers
debated with him. Some said, “What does this babbler want to say?” Others
said, “He seems to be a proclaimer of foreign divinities.” (This was
because he was telling the good news about Jesus and the resurrection.) So
they took him and brought him to the Areopagus and asked him, “May we know
what this new teaching is that you are presenting? It sounds rather
strange to us, so we would like to know what it means.” Now all the
Athenians and the foreigners living there would spend their time in
nothing but telling or hearing something new. Then Paul stood in front of
the Areopagus and said, “Athenians, I see how extremely religious you are
in every way. For as I went through the city and looked carefully at the
objects of your worship, I found among them an altar with the inscription,
‘To an unknown god.’ What therefore you worship as unknown, this I
proclaim to you. The God who made the world and everything in it, he who
is Lord of heaven and earth, does not live in shrines made by human hands,
nor is he served by human hands, as though he needed anything, since he
himself gives to all mortals life and breath and all things. From one
ancestor£ he made all nations to inhabit the whole earth, and he allotted
the times of their existence and the boundaries of the places where they
would live, so that they would search for God£ and perhaps grope for him
and find him—though indeed he is not far from each one of us. For ‘In him
we live and move and have our being’; as even some of your own poets have
said, ‘For we too are his offspring.’ Since we are God’s offspring, we
ought not to think that the deity is like gold, or silver, or stone, an
image formed by the art and imagination of mortals. While God has
overlooked the times of human ignorance, now he commands all people
everywhere to repent, because he has fixed a day on which he will have the
world judged in righteousness by a man whom he has appointed, and of this
he has given assurance to all by raising him from the dead.” When they
heard of the resurrection of the dead, some scoffed; but others said, “We
will hear you again about this.” At that point Paul left them. But some of
them joined him and became believers, including Dionysius the Areopagite
and a woman named Damaris, and others with them. (Acts
17:16-34) (NRSV)
"While Paul was waiting for them in Athens, he was greatly
distressed to see that the city was full of idols."
Here is the scene - Paul is alone in the city of Athens.
He is waiting for Silas and Timothy to join him, but he is not in the mood
to waste time. He goes for a walk through that great city and comes back
greatly distressed for he has discovered that the city is full of false
idols. Like we discovered a couple of weeks ago, sharing the love of God
with others begins with a broken heart. Paul had a broken heart for this
city. Paul is greatly distressed because he sees all these idols - a
sign of a pluralistic culture - and he knows that these people desperately
need to know the great living God. This must be our motivation. This is
important because sometimes we get to thinking, as we live in this
pluralistic society, that because a person has their belief or their gods,
that we don't have a right to speak to them about our faith.
I'm not
suggesting we impose or force, but we need to understand that leaving
people in an ungodly haze is not a sign of love or respect for another. It
was Elton Trueblood who said that there was no place in Christianity for
mere well-wishers. We share the love of God with others because we love others
and want them to know the wonder of his unmerited favour.
So what does Paul do? Look at verse 17. First he goes to where
the people are and he engages them in conversation about eternal matters.
Paul knew that he served a sending God. Do you know that you serve a
sending God? He is constantly sending - He sent Abraham from his country
and family into the great unknown, promising to bless him and to bless the
world through him.
God sent Joseph into Egypt, overcoming his brother's
cruelty in order to preserve a remnant on earth. God sent Moses to an
oppressed people in Egypt with the good news of liberation. God sent a
continuous stream of prophets with words of warning and promise. Then in
the fullness of time when the time had fully come, God sent His Son and
then the Son sent the Spirit.
Now the Son sends us, His people, as He Himself was sent.
Jesus tells us to GO. In John 20:21 He says, "As the Father sent Me, so I
send you". And in Mark's Gospel, "Go into all the world and preach the
good news to all creation." (Mark 16:16).
So we are called to go where the people are. We need to be
participating in our neighbourhood barbecues. We need to in the arenas
and on the ball diamonds, and in the marketplaces. We need Christians in
the condominiums and in the schools influencing people for Christ. We
need Christians in the office buildings and in the governments. We need
to go where people are influencing them for Christ.
Now I would be the last one to tell you that you don't need
to go to a Bible Study or join a small group. Some of you already
do. But your
relationship with God will be stagnating if you are only allowing Him one
hour of your time a week.
But others of you - your faith has grown stale because the
Christian community is your only community. Don Posterski, president of
World Vision writes about contained Christians and he says that contained
Christians worship together, travel together, go on retreats together.
They search for Christian plumbers and dentists. They lunch with each
other in crowded cafeterias. They take vacations at the same times in the
same places. They spend New Year's Eve at the watchnight service and New
Year's day watching football on television and eating in each other's
homes. Christians in containment socialize and fraternize - always
together. Eventually they form subcultural groups within the culture.1
So what happens is that the outside world is seen as a
place to get what we need, like money, or work, or leisure, but it is not
seen as place to actually live. Posterski concludes, "The mind of the
contained Christian is set on the dial of survival rather than on
penetration. He fears getting influenced and does not worry about being
an influence.2
We need to be involved with people - if you need some help with
that here are some suggestions -
 |
Offer your services as a block parent
|
 |
Coach a community sports team
|
 |
Help out in a political campaign
|
 |
Join the Rotary Club or some other business association
|
 |
Go back to the same beauty salon or barbershop
|
 |
Serve pizza on Wednesdays at our high school lunch drop-in
|
 |
Train and serve on a distress hotline
|
 |
Join the garden club
|
 |
Try out for an all school team
|
 |
Volunteer at the local food bank
|
 |
Deliver Meal on Wheels
|
 |
Drive for the cancer society
|
 |
Invite the neighbours over for a barbecue
|
We need to be where the people are influencing them for
Christ. How is that done? What is Paul's approach? He accepted the people (see verses 18-21). If we wish to share our faith in our pluralistic age we
must accept people with the baggage that they bring with them in order to
establish that all important trust factor. If Paul had an attitude of judgment or superiority toward
the philosophers, they would have written off both Paul and his message.
But by meeting them on their terms with an open attitude we open the door
to potential influence.
I admit it's a tension - to identify with others without
being identical to them, to be in the world and not of it. That's why
it's important that we gather together to worship, and participate in
small group Bible studies and times of prayer. We go to these events -
not to cloister ourselves from the world, which is what sometimes happens, but the purpose is to support one another, to get our focus right again
so that we can go back out into the world being salt, preserving and
influencing it for God.
We need to realize that acceptance allows us the right in
our society to share our faith. If you don't give it you won't get it. If
you do not accept people, they do not accept you. If you do not listen
seriously to people, they do not listen seriously to you.
It is Rebecca Pippert who gives us a modern example of what
it means to accept people without being identical to them. She tells of
how a girl who lived in the apartment below always seemed to be on her way
to a party. They always exchanged friendly words and one day she said,
"Becky, I like you. You're all right. Let's get together next week and
smoke a joint, okay?"
Becky replied, "Gee, thanks, I'd really like you too, and
I'd love to spend time with you. Actually I can't stand the stuff, but
I'd sure love to do something else."
And she tells of how the girl looked a bit surprised, not
so much because Becky didn't smoke grass, but because she had expressed
delight at the thought of spending time with her. She could have told
her, "I'm a Christian and I never touch the stuff." But
she wanted to
affirm whatever she possibly could without selling short Christian
standards.
"Too often we broadcast what we don't do when we should be
trying to discover genuine points of contact. Most of us tend either to
over-identify and blend in so well that no one can tell we are Christians
or to separate ourselves and play it safe by having little contact with
the world. We should recognize what our tendency is and work against it."3
Go where people are, accept people. Next we need to show
people that they are of worth.
Again, Paul is our model verses 22-23. It is clear that
Paul does not waver in his proclamation of the truth. From verse 18 we
know that Paul preached about Jesus and the resurrection. He proclaimed
the sovereignty of God in verses 24-28. And he called them to repent of
their sin in verse 30. And the coming judgment in verse 31.
BUT he does not ignore what is important to the people.
Notice his opening words - he does not tear down, there is no hint of
aggressiveness or hint of attack in his approach. His aim is to build on
what exists and bring clarity to what is unknown.
You notice from the text that Paul quotes a poet from their
heritage. He builds a bridge between himself and his listeners - there is
none of this attitude that says, "I'm right and you're wrong and you
better shape up". No, he acknowledges what is important to them and their
culture. And he uses that to build a bridge and he uses that bridge to
proclaim the truth of God's existence and the reality of His Son.
The bridges we can use are sometimes verbal bridges but
most often folks in our day, in our pluralistic age, the bridge that we
can use to show people that they are valuable, that we love them with the
love of Christ - the bridge that connects us with others is - caring.
Genuine care for another is that bridge that tells people that they are of
worth and that we serve a loving Lord.
So when divorce strikes the home across the street from us
we are the first ones there with the offer of babysitting or a hot meal.
If housing is a crisis, God's people make extra room in their homes. If a
business colleague is fired, we phone or visit and offer our resources and
ourselves. In the midst of financial difficulty we are there to offer
support in tangible ways. If someone is lonely we bring a pot of tea and
a listening, compassionate ear. All those are examples of ways we show
that they are important, of great worth, and that we accept them.
I
hope that you leave this place this morning, not fearing or bemoaning
pluralism. The good thing about our pluralistic age is that people are
open to new influences. I don't think we need to lament the rise of
pluralism. We have a wonderful message to share and pluralism simply
offers us more venues to offer it to others. To engage people in this
pluralistic age we need to go to where people are. We need to accept
people. Show them that they are people of worth and you will win a
hearing for the great truth that has transformed your life.
Copyright MBC and Tom Cullen -
May 2003